ACOSTA v. ONE HELPING ANOTHER HOME HEALTH SERVICES, LLC et al
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA |
ONE HELPING ANOTHER HOME HEALTH SERVICES, LLC and CLAYTON BUTLER |
2:2019cv00625 |
February 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MARK A KEARNEY |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER THAT DEFTS ONE HELPING ANOTHER HOME HEALTH SERVICES, LLC & CLAYTON BUTLER, THEIR OFFICERS, AGENTS, SERVANTS, ETC. ARE PERMANENTLY ENJOINED & RESTRAINED FROM VIOLATING SECTIONS 6, 7, 11(c), & 15 OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT, IN ANY MANNER, ETC. EACH PARTY WILL BEAR ITS OWN FEES & OTHER EXPENSES INCURRED BY HE OR IT IN CONNECTION WITH ANY STAGE OF THIS PROCEEDING, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ATTORNEY FEES WHICH MAY BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 2/14/19. 2/15/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREPRESENTED PARTY.(kw, ) |
|
Filing 2 MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment filed by R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Consent Judgment)(LUBY, ANDREA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLAYTON BUTLER, ONE HELPING ANOTHER HOME HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, filed by R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA.(jwl, ) |
Summons Issued as to CLAYTON BUTLER, ONE HELPING ANOTHER HOME HEALTH SERVICES, LLC. Two Forwarded To: Counsel on 2/13/19 (jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.