BRIGADE TRADING CORP. et al v. POMPEO et al
| BRIGADE TRADING CORP. and BATYRZHON AKHMEDOV |
| MICHAEL POMPEO, CARL RISCH, DOES 1 THROUGH 10, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and MARIE L. YOVANOVITCH |
| 2:2019cv00642 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ROBERT F KELLY |
| Prisoner Petitions: Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (va, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against DOES 1 THROUGH 10, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, MICHAEL POMPEO, CARL RISCH, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, MARIE L. YOVANOVITCH ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 192514.), filed by BATYRZHON AKHMEDOV, BRIGADE TRADING CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, DESIGNATION FORM, CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK FORM)(amas) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by BATYRZHON AKHMEDOV, BRIGADE TRADING CORP.. (amas) |
| 7 Summons Issued as to KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, MICHAEL POMPEO, CARL RISCH, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, MARIE L. YOVANOVITCH, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded 6 COPIES TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL AND 1 TO THE US ATTY. on 2/15/2019 (amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
