HARRIS et al v. SULLIVAN et al
| KATHLEEN HARRIS and MARK HARRIS |
| DOUBLE G LOGISTICS, INC. and ROBERT SULLIVAN |
| 2:2019cv00938 |
| March 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of PHILADELPHIA County. (amas,) |
Filing 3
ORDER THAT THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41.1(b). SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 3/14/2019. 3/15/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER THAT A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SHALL BE HELD ON 3/27/2019, AT 8:30 AM, IN ROOM 9614, BEFORE HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 3/6/2019. 3/7/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by DOUBLE G LOGISTICS, INC., ROBERT SULLIVAN from Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, case number 190200325. Certificate of Service. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 193563) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Designation Form, #5 Case Management Track Form)(ahf) |
| Case Eligible for Arbitration(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
