WRIGHT v. MCGINLEY et al
SHAWN WRIGHT |
THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2019cv00941 |
March 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
WENDY BEETLESTONE |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Memorandum of Law in support of petition for writ of habeas corpus (28 USC, Section 2254) filed by SHAWN WRIGHT. Cert. of Service. (pr, ) (Main Document 5 replaced on 4/4/2019) (pr, ). |
Filing 4 ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER PETITION SHALL COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR REMIT THE REQUIRED $5.00 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 3/14/19. 3/15/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER WITH FORMS.(jaa, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER of USCA dated 3/5/2019 that the Petition is Transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (jwl, ) Modified on 3/7/2019 (jwl, ). Modified on 3/7/2019 (md). |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, filed by SHAWN WRIGHT. NO FEE. NO IFP. NO ENVELOPE INCLUDED. (Attachments: #1 Order)(jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.