SHARPE et al v. SPICER et al
| DENNIS W SHARPE, DENNIS M SHARPE and MARYANN SHARPE |
| POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL E. SPICER, POLICE OFFICER LINWOOD NORMAN, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-5, POLICE OFFICER BRIAN REYNOLDS, POLICE OFFICER JOHN SPEISER, POLICE OFFICER PERRY BETTS and POLICE OFFICER THOMAS LICIARDELLO |
| 2:2019cv00983 |
| March 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAUL S DIAMOND |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLACE THIS MATTER IN THE CIVIL SUSPENSE DOCKET.SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 3/8/2019. 3/8/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PERRY BETTS, JOHN DOE #1-5, THOMAS LICIARDELLO, LINWOOD NORMAN, BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, MICHAEL E. SPICER ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE193725 filed by MARYANN SHARPE, DENNIS M SHARPE, DENNIS W SHARPE, JURY TRIAL DEMAND.(rf, ) |
| 6 Original Summons Issued as to PERRY BETTS, THOMAS LICIARDELLO, LINWOOD NORMAN, BRIAN REYNOLDS, JOHN SPEISER, MICHAEL E. SPICER forwarded to Plaintiffs' Counsel on 3/8/19. (rf, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by DENNIS M SHARPE, DENNIS W SHARPE, MARYANN SHARPE. (rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
