ZOSTAVAX (ZOSTER VACCINE LIVE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
| RITA BISHOP |
| MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC. |
| ZOSTAVAX (ZOSTER VACCINE LIVE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION |
| 2:2019cv01204 |
| March 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 49 (PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL CONTACT FORM) AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/3/2018. 3/22/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (APPLIES TO ALL ACTIONS)(kp, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by DINO S. SANGIAMO on behalf of MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. with Certificate of Service(SANGIAMO, DINO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE194386.) filed by RITA BISHOP, JURY TRIAL DEMAND. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(rf, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by RITA BISHOP. (rf, ) |
| 2 Original Summons Issued as to MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. forwarded to Plaintiff's Counsel on 3/21/19. (rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
