YELVERTON v. BERRYHILL
MARIA C. YELVERTON |
NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
2:2019cv01256 |
March 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
TIMOTHY R RICE |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Procedural Order 3/26/19 Entered and copies e-mailed. (mbh, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONSES. THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND COMPLAINT UPON SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AND UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE ON 3/26/19. 3/26/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, ) |
Three (3) Summons Issued as to NANCY A. BERRYHILL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Two (2) Forwarded To: U.S. Marshal Service on 3/26/19 and One (1) given to U.S. Attorney (mbh, ) |
Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 Consent)(ahf) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by MARIA C. YELVERTON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets)(ahf) |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY MARIA C. YELVERTON.(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.