YODER v. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MONTGOMERY CTY et al
| CYNTHIA M. YODER |
| MS. TERRY, CHESTER COUNTY PROBATION, PAROLE & PRETRIAL SERVICES, MR. MICHAEL FALIN, MS. ANITA SETH, MR. TODD BARNES, MR. BASIL BECK, MS. JEANINE WARTELL, MS. DIANE CLEMENS, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MONTGOMERY CTY, MS. SHARON MEISLER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE, MS. MAUREEN TRESTON, AMS LAW, P.C., MR. WILLIAM MANN and MR. JOSEPH CARLINI |
| 2:2019cv01274 |
| March 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against AMS LAW, P.C., TODD BARNES, BASIL BECK, JOSEPH CARLINI, CHESTER COUNTY PROBATION, PAROLE & PRETRIAL SERVICES, DIANE CLEMENS, MICHAEL FALIN, WILLIAM MANN, SHARON MEISLER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MONTGOMERY CTY, ANITA SETH, TERRY, MAUREEN TRESTON, JEANINE WARTELL, filed by CYNTHIA M. YODER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ahf) Modified on 3/27/2019 (lisad, ). |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY CYNTHIA M. YODER.(ahf) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CYNTHIA M. YODER. (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
