BATTISTE v. CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A. et al
NICHOLAS BATTISTE |
INNOVIS, CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, TRANSUNION, LLC and EXPERIAN |
2:2019cv02063 |
May 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MARK A KEARNEY |
Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDERED THAT THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)(A)(I) AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/22/19. 5/22/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(jaa, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by NICHOLAS BATTISTE (FROBA, CHRISTOPHER) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by NICHOLAS BATTISTE (FROBA, CHRISTOPHER) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 Identifying Corporate Parent TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC., Corporate Parent TRANSUNION for TRANSUNION, LLC., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by TRANSUNION, LLC.(rf, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TRANSUNION, LLC from COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, case number 190404838. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE197269), EXHIBITS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form, #4 Case Management Track Form)(rf, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/14/2019: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (tjd, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.