CORBETT et al v. KONE, INC.
| ELIZABETH CORBETT and JOSEPH CORBETT |
| KONE, INC. |
| 2:2019cv02067 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF HEARING: THE INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE PREVIOUSLY SET FOR JULY 22, 2019 HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED FOR 9/24/2019 AT 2:00 PM IN CHAMBERS (ROOM 10613) BEFORE THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER.(sfl, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Hearing: INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 7/22/2019 10:00 AM IN JUDGE CHAMBERS BEFORE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement, #3 Supplement)(rab, ) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 Identifying Corporate Parent KONE HOLDINGS, INC. (DELAWARE), Corporate Parent FINESCAL OY (FINLAND), Corporate Parent KONE CORPORATION (FINLAND) for KONE, INC.. by KONE, INC..(jwl, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by KONE, INC. from Common Pleas Philadelphia, case number 190200991. Certificate of Service.(Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 197279) (Attachments: #1 Case Management Track Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Designation Form)(jwl, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ELIZABETH CORBETT, JOSEPH CORBETT, KONE, INC.. (jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
