ROYSTER v. MAHALLY et al
TELLY ROYSTER |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA and LAWRENCE MAHALLY |
2:2019cv02126 |
May 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
C DARNELL JONES |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by TELLY ROYSTER. (jl, ) |
Filing 5 TELLY ROYSTER MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS..(jl, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH THE COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER, & PETITIONER SHALL COMPLETE THE APPLICATION & RETURN IT TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR PAY THE $5.00 FILING FEE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 5/24/19. 5/24/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(kw, ) |
Copy of application to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se petitioner on 5/24/19. (kw, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by TELLY ROYSTER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ahf) |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY TELLY ROYSTER.(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.