FLORES v. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: MARITZA FLORES
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 2:2019cv02256
Filed: May 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: DAVID R STRAWBRIDGE
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2019 Filing 8 Affidavit of Service re: U.S. Marshal Service served Summons and Complaint upon Commissioner of Social Security and U.S. Attorney General by FedEx on 6/7/19 (mbh, )
July 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THE CONSENT TO OR DECLINATION OF JURISDICTION OF A MAGISTRATE FORM WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLETE AND FILE THE FORM AS ORDERED HEREIN SHALL BE DEEMED CONSENT TO THE JURISDICTION OF A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND THE ASSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILL EXERCISE JURISDICTION FOR ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 7/16/19. 7/17/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
June 7, 2019 Filing 6 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (mbh, )
May 28, 2019 Filing 5 Procedural Order 5/28/19 Entered and copies e-mailed. (mbh, )
May 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONSES. THE US MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FRCP 4(i) UPON SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AND US ATTORNEY GENERAL. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE US ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 5/24/19. 5/28/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
May 28, 2019 (3) Summonses Issued as to NANCY A. BERRYHILL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (2) forwarded to U.S. Marshal Service on 5/28/19 and (1) given to U.S Attorney. (mbh, )
May 23, 2019 Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 Consent)(ahf)
May 23, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by MARITZA FLORES. DECLARATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets)(ahf)
May 23, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY MARITZA FLORES.(ahf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FLORES v. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARITZA FLORES
Represented By: SAMUEL I. BROOKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?