NELSON v. GARMAN et al
ARNOLD P. NELSON |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and MARK GARMAN |
2:2019cv02397 |
June 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
EDWARD G SMITH |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. #1 ) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH NELSON WITH THE COURTS CURRENT STANDARD APPLICATION FOR PRISONERS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER; NELSON SHALL COMPLETE THE APPLICATION AND RETURN IT TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR PAY THE $5.00 FILING FEE, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; AND IF NELSON DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE COURT WILL DISMISS THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO HIM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 6/7/19.6/7/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE ALONG WITH THE COURTS CURRENT STANDARD APPLICATION FOR PRISONERS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BEARING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER.(mas, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ARNOLD P. NELSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jwl, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by ARNOLD P. NELSON..(jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.