CAESAR v. OBERLANDER et al
| LAMONT CAESAR |
| D.F. OBERLANDER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA |
| 2:2019cv02398 |
| June 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAUL S DIAMOND |
| MARILYN HEFFLEY |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| State Court Record received. (nd, ) |
Filing 6
ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS IS GRANTED, AND RESPONDENTS' TIME TO FILE THEIR RESPONSE TO THE PETITION IS EXTENDED UNTIL SEPTEMBER 9, 2019. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 7/11/19.7/11/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by D.F. OBERLANDER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA.Certificate of Service.Motions referred to MARILYN HEFFLEY.(GOLDWERT, JOSHUA) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE A DETAILED AND SPECIFIC ANSWER TO THE PETITION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. THE CLERK OF COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWALTH v. LAMONT, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA, CP-51-CR-0300183-2005, CP-51-CR-300191-2005, CP-51-CR-0900721-2005, CP-51-CR-05030018, CP-51-CR-05030019, CP-51-CR-05090072 WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PRISONER STATE RECORD DUE BY 8/10/2019. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 6/10/19. 6/11/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND CERTIFIED MAIL WITH COPY OF ORDER PETITION AND DOCKET TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERALS OF PHILALDEPHIA AND HARRISBURG AND FAXED TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. (jpd)
|
| COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND CERTIFIED MAIL WITH COPY OF ORDER PETITION AND DOCKET TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERALS OF PHILALDELPHIA AND HARRISBURG AND FAXED TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE MARILYN HEFFLEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JDUGE FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLACE THIS MATTER IN THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE PENDING. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 6/7/19. 6/10/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED WITH COPY OF ORDER, PETITION AND DOCKET SHEET TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA. (jpd )
|
| COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED WITH COPY OF ORDER, PETITION AND DOCKET SHEET TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA. (jpd )) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 198378.), filed by LAMONT CAESAR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
