MILLER v. FERGUSON et al
| KENNETH MALIK MILLER |
| C.E.R.T. JOHN DOE'S, JOHN WETZEL, D. SUPERINTENDENT MANDY SIPPLE and TAMMY FERGUSON |
| 2:2019cv02456 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOEL H SLOMSKY |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER #4 FILED BY KENNETH MALIK MILLER.(lvj, ) |
| Filing 5 KENNETH MALIK MILLER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS..(jl, ) |
Filing 4
ORDERD THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; IF PLAINTIFF SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE HE SHALL EITHER FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR THE SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD FROM 12/5/18 THROUGH 6/5/19 OR HE MAY REMIT THE $400.00 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/14/19. 6/17/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF. (jpd )
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against C.E.R.T. JOHN DOE'S, TAMMY FERGUSON, MANDY SIPPLE, JOHN WETZEL, filed by KENNETH MALIK MILLER.(ahf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/6/2019: #1 Envelope) (ahf, ). |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY KENNETH MALIK MILLER.(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
