PLOTNICK et al v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
CHARLES PLOTNICK and DIANE PLOTNICK |
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION |
2:2019cv02486 |
June 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
R BARCLAY SURRICK |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing: ARBITRATION HEARING SET FOR 11/20/2019 09:30 AM IN Philadelphia.(ahf) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE PROTHONOTARY OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, MAY SUBMIT THE AFORESAID RECORDS TO THE CLERK OF THIS COURT IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT, SO THAT THEY CAN BE FILED IN ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 7/10/19. 7/11/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint together with Affirmative Defenses by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION.(SPERLING, WARREN) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 Identifying Corporate Parent DAVIS SELECTED ADVISORS, LLP for COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION.(ahf) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION from Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018-28122. Certificate of Service. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 198589)(ahf) |
Case Eligible for Arbitration(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.