RICHARDS v. BANANA REPUBLIC et al
| SAMEERAH A. RICHARDS |
| SYNCHRONY BANK and BANANA REPUBLIC |
| 2:2019cv02565 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD J PAPPERT |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT PLFF'S PRO SE AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 4) IS DEEMED FILED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 3) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 7/31/19.8/1/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF.(kw, )
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against BANANA REPUBLIC, SYNCHRONY BANK, Certificate of Service, filed by PRO SE PLFF SAMEERAH A. RICHARDS.(kw, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by BANANA REPUBLIC, SYNCHRONY BANK.Memorandum, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(WEIKEL, JAMES) |
| Case Eligible for Arbitration(jwl, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BANANA REPUBLIC, SYNCHRONY BANK from Common Pleas Philadelphia, case number 19050097. Certificate of Service. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 198882)(jwl, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/14/2019) (jwl, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
