ROGERS v. SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD.
| AALIYAH ROGERS |
| SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD. |
| 2:2019cv02567 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ANITA B BRODY |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Hearing:A RULE 16 CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD ON 10/15/2019 AT 11:00 AM IN JUDGE CHAMBERS, ROOM 7613 ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF THE U.S. COURTHOUSE, 601 MARKET ST., PHILADELPHIA, PA, BEFORE HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY.8/7/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF.(mo, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD..Brief, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(AYES, MITCHELL) (Main Document 7 replaced on 8/9/2019) (tjd, ). |
Filing 6
ORDER - UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT SMITH VOLKSWAGEN LTD'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD, AND ALL OTHER SUBMISSIONS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED... MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER... IS GRANTED.... DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TOPLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT IS EXTENDED TO AUGUST 5, 2019.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 7/15/2019.7/15/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF.(mo, )
|
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 with Certificate of Service by SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(AYES, MITCHELL) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead filed by SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD..CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(AYES, MITCHELL) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by KEVIN J. KOTCH on behalf of AALIYAH ROGERS with Certificate of Service(KOTCH, KEVIN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AALIYAH ROGERS re: MARTIN ETTORE served Summons and Complaint upon SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD. by PERSONAL SERVICE. SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD. served on 6/14/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. (jl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 198880.), filed by AALIYAH ROGERS.(jwl, ) |
| Summons Issued as to SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD.. One Forwarded To: Counsel on 6/13/19 (jwl, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by AALIYAH ROGERS. (jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ROGERS v. SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AALIYAH ROGERS | |
| Represented By: | RICHARD H. KIM |
| Represented By: | KEVIN J. KOTCH |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SMITH VOLKSWAGEN, LTD. | |
| Represented By: | MITCHELL AYES |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
