STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
Plaintiff: STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Case Number: 2:2019cv02751
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: PAUL S DIAMOND
Nature of Suit: Property Rights: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2019 Filing 6 Letter re Status Report by STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. (ATKIN, JOHN) Modified on 8/22/2019 (md).
August 12, 2019 Filing 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL SUBMIT A WEEKLY STATUS REPORT ON ITS EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY AND SERVE DEFENDANT NO LATER THAN 2:00 P.M. EVERY FRIDAY, BEGINNING AUGUST 16, 2019. SPECIFICALLY, PLAINTIFF SHALL ADDRESS: (1) WHEN, AND UPON WHOM, IT HAS SERVED RULE 45 SUBPOENAS; AND (2) WHETHER IT HAS RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO ANY SUBPOENA THAT IDENTIFIES DEFENDANT. IF PLAINTIFF HAS RECEIVED A RESPONSE THAT IDENTIFIES DEFENDANT, PLAINTIFF SHALL: (1) DESCRIBE WHAT, IF ANY, EFFORTS IT HAS MADE TO SERVE THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON DEFENDANT; AND (2) STATE WHETHER IT HAS OTHERWISE CONTACTED DEFENDANT, AND IF SO, EXPLAIN THE NATURE OF THAT CONTACT. THIS ORDER SHALL TERMINATE UPON PLAINTIFF'S SERVICE OF DEFENDANT WITH THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLACE THIS CASE IN THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE PENDING SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON DEFENDANT.SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 8/12/2019. 8/12/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt)
August 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE A THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE (DOC. NO. #3 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION (DOC. NO. #3 ) IS GRANTED AS FOLLOWS: 1. PLAINTIFF MAY SERVE THE ISP WITH A RULE 45 SUBPOENA COMMANDING THE ISP TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF WITH THE TRUE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE DDEFENDANT TO WHOM THE ISP ASSIGNED AN IP ADDRESS AS SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT A TO THE COMPLAINT. PLAINTIFF SHALL ATTACH TO ANY SUCH SUBPOENA A COPY OF THIS ORDER; 2. PLAINTIFF MAY ALSO SERVE A RULE 45 SUBPOENA IN THE SAME MANNER AS ABOVE ON ANY SERVICE PROVIDER THAT IS IDENTIFIED IN RESPONSE TO A SUBPOENA AS A PROVIDER OF INTERNET SERVICES TO THE DEFENDANT; 3. IF THE ISP QUALIFIES AS A "CABLE OPERATOR," AS DEFINED BY 47 U.S.C. 522(5), THIS ORDER FURTHER AUTHORIZES DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. 551(C)(2)(B); 4. PLAINTIFF SHALL ATTACH THE COURT-DIRECTED NOTICE REGARDING ISSUANCE OF SUBPEONA, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER, TO ANY RULE 45 SUBPOENA; 5. ANY RULE 45 SUBPOENA SHALL INSTRUCT THE ISP TO DISTRIBUTE A COPY OF THIS NOTICE TO DEFENDANT WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF SERVICE OF THE SUBPOENA; 6. AS SET FORTH MORE FULLY IN THE COURT-DIRECTED NOTICE, DEFENDANT SHALL HAVE TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE TO FILE A MOTION TO QUASH OR VACATE THE SUBPOENA. THE ISP SHALL NOT RELEASE TO PLAINTIFF OR ITS ATTORNEYS THE DEFENDANT'S IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ANY SOONER THAN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS AFTER THE ISP HAS SENT THE COURT-DIRECTED NOTICE TO DEFENDANT; 7. IF DEFENDANT OR AN ISP FILES A MOTION CHALLENGING THE SUBPOENA, THE ISP SHALL NOT PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION TO PLAINTIFF OR ITS ATTORNEYS WITHOUT AN ORDER OF THE COURT AUTHORIZING THE ISP TO PRODUCE THE REQUESTED DISCOVERY; AND 8. PLAINTIFF SHALL NOT DISSEMINATE OR USE ANY INFORMATION DISCLOSED IN A RESPONSE TO A RULE 45 SUBPOENA FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN PROTECTING PLAINTIFF'S RIGHTS AS SET FORTH IN ITS COMPLAINT.SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 8/12/2019. 8/12/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt)
August 9, 2019 Filing 3 First MOTION for Discovery Seeking Leave To Serve A Third Party Subpoena Prior To A Rule 26(f) Conference filed by STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.Memorandum of Law, Declaration(s), Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit A -- Declaration of Greg Lansky, #3 Exhibit B -- Declaration of Tobias Fieser, #4 Exhibit C -- Declaration of John S. Pasquale, #5 Exhibit D -- Declaration of Susan B. Stalzer, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(ATKIN, JOHN)
July 29, 2019 Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including GENERAL MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC by STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.(ATKIN, JOHN)
June 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 199362.), filed by STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.(jwl, ) (jwl, ). (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/25/2019) (jwl, ).
June 24, 2019 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC. (jwl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Represented By: JOHN C. ATKIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?