MERCER et al v. ARAMARK CORPORATION
| MICHAEL MERCER and LEO FORD |
| ARAMARK CORPORATION |
| 2:2019cv02762 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JAN E DUBOIS |
| JOHN R PADOVA |
| Contract: Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by MARK B. DESANTO on behalf of LEO FORD, MICHAEL MERCER (DESANTO, MARK) |
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA TO HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 08/07/2019. 08/07/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nd, )
|
|
Filing 3
STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT ARAMARK CORPORATION ANSWER BY 8/1/2019. ADDITIONAL DEADLINES OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 8/1/19. 8/1/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by SAMANTHA E. JONES on behalf of LEO FORD, MICHAEL MERCER (JONES, SAMANTHA) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against ARAMARK CORPORATION (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE199388) filed by MICHAEL MERCER and LEO FORD. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6)(mbh, ) |
| (1) Summons Issued as to ARAMARK CORPORATION. Forwarded To: counsel on 6/25/19 (mbh, ) |
| Demand for Trial by Jury (mbh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
