MCFADDEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
TALLI J. MCFADDEN |
A. ELLIS, K. LINDLEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and K. ZELLARS |
2:2019cv02900 |
July 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JUAN R SANCHEZ |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Affidavit of Service by U.S. Marshal Service re: served Summons and Complaint upon United States of America by FedEx on 7/26/19 (mbh, ) |
Filing 9 Status Report on Request for USM 285 Form (jpd, ) |
Filing 8 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (fdc, ) |
|
4 Summons Issued as to A. ELLIS, K. LINDLEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, K. ZELLARS. Forwarded To: U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE on 7/9/19 (jpd, ) |
|
Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
Filing 4 MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FILED BY TALLI J. MCFADDEN.(ahf) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by TALLI J. MCFADDEN. (ahf) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against A. ELLIS, K. LINDLEY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, K. ZELLARS, filed by TALLI J. MCFADDEN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ahf) |
Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY TALLI J. MCFADDEN.(ahf) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by TALLI J. MCFADDEN. (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.