DOUGLAS v. KAMPER
| LOLITA DOUGLAS and LOLITA DUGLAS |
| FRED KAMPER |
| 2:2019cv03010 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GENE EK PRATTER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against FRED KAMPER, filed by LOLITA DUGLAS. (NO ENVELOPE) (fdc) |
| Filing 6 MOTION FOR ORDER FILED BY LOLITA DUGLAS.(fdc) |
Filing 5
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF LOLITA DUGLAS'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED; THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED; THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/15/2019. 7/17/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(sfl, )
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY THE HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/15/2019. 7/17/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(sfl, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/17/2019) (jwl, ). |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against FRED KAMPER, filed by LOLITA DUGLAS. NO ENVELOPE.(jwl, ) Modified on 7/17/2019 (jwl, ). |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by LOLITA DUGLAS..(jwl, ) Modified on 7/17/2019 (jwl, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
