STOKES v. MARSH et al
JOSHUA STOKES |
LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, JOSH SHAPIRO and ROBERT MARSH |
2:2019cv03019 |
July 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
HENRY S PERKIN |
GENE EK PRATTER |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PETITIONER JOSHUA STOKES' MOTION FOR STAY ABEYANCE PENDING EXHAUSTION, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Motions referred to HENRY S. PERKIN. (jpd ) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF 7/19/2019 THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF PHILADELHIA IS ADDED AS A RESPONDENT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF PHILADLEPHIA SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO THE PETITION AND A BRIEF OR MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF AND ATTACH COPIES OF THE PERTINENT RECORDS, STATE COURT ORDERS, MEMORANDA, AND DECISIONS THERETO WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PURSUANT TO RULE 5, 28 U.S.C. FOL. 2254. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 7/19/19. 7/22/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(DT) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF 7/19/2019 THAT THE PROTHONOTARY OF PHILADELPHIA/CLERK OF COURTS FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA, COUNTY, SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, PRE-TRIAL AND SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, TRIAL, POST-TRIAL AND POST-CONVICTION HEARINGS AND APPEALS; AND ALL TRIAL, APPELLATE AND POST-CONVICTION BRIEFS AND PETITIONS; ALL PLEADINGS; AND ALL COURT OPINIONS OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. JOSHUA STOKES, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, NO. CP-51-CR-0000720-2011. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: HENRY S. PERKIN ON 7/19/19. 7/22/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED TO PROTHONOTARY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. (DT) |
Copies of Docket Sheet, Order and Petition for Habeas Corpus E-Mailed to The District Attorney of Philadelphia County; Copies of the Petition for Habeas Corpus and Order sent to Warden and Attorney General by Certified Mail. (DT) (DT) |
Filing 4 ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE HENRY S. PERKIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PETITION TO THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/18/19. 7/19/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETTIONER AND E-MAILED WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION, ORDER AND DOCKET TO THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY.(jpd) |
COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETTIONER AND E-MAILED WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION, ORDER AND DOCKET TO THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY.(jpd) |
Filing 3 ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PETITIONER WITH AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER PLAINTIFF SHALL COMPLETE, SIGN AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR SUBMIT THE $5.00 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK AND IF PETITIONER DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER THE CIVIL ACTION WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO HIM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 7/16/19. 7/17/19 ENTERED AND COPY OF ORDER AND APPLICATION MAILED TO PRO SE PETTIONER.(jpd, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JOSHUA STOKES. NO FEE. NO IFP. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.