HOLMES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al
| KEITH HOLMES |
| DAVID WRIGHT, SIMON THOMPSON SEMONE and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT |
| 2:2019cv03231 |
| July 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ROBERT F KELLY |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to Motion re #2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Answer to Motion to Dismiss filed by KEITH HOLMES. (MCDERMOTT, MICHAEL) |
Filing 3
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. THE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS EXTENDED TO 8/16/19. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 8/13/19. 8/14/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT, SIMON THOMPSON SEMONE, DAVID WRIGHT. Brief and Certificate of Service.(MILLER, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT, SIMON THOMPSON SEMONE, DAVID WRIGHT from COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, case number 180703856. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, EXHIBITS. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 200935)(sg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
