KEEL v. DIRECT EXPRESS BANK FRAUD SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Plaintiff: JESSIE LEE KEEL, III
Defendant: DIRECT EXPRESS BANK FRAUD SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Case Number: 2:2019cv03813
Filed: August 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: GENE EK PRATTER
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2019 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. MAILED TO PRO SE LITIGANT. (fdc)
August 22, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against DIRECT EXPRESS BANK FRAUD SERVICES DEPARTMENT, filed by JESSIE LEE KEEL, III. (IFP PENDING)(fdc)
August 22, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY ESSIE LEE KEEL, III.(fdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KEEL v. DIRECT EXPRESS BANK FRAUD SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JESSIE LEE KEEL, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DIRECT EXPRESS BANK FRAUD SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?