HANGLEY et al v. THE OMNI COLLECTIVE LLC et al
| FLEETWAY LEASING COMPANY, INC. |
| CLARK GIRGES, MARGARET GIRGES, THE OMNI COLLECTIVE LLC, FRANK GIRGES, SAMEH GIRGES and ANDREW GIRGES |
| WILLIAM T. HANGLEY |
| 2:2019cv03916 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAUL S DIAMOND |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Substitute Exhibits to the Complaint filed by WILLIAM T. HANGLEY.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 4, #2 Exhibit 5, #3 Exhibit 6, #4 Exhibit 7, #5 Proposed Order)(HAMERMESH, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WILLIAM T. HANGLEY re: Maranatha Bedford served Summons and Complaint upon SAMEH GIRGES by Process Server. SAMEH GIRGES served on 9/26/2019. (HAMERMESH, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WILLIAM T. HANGLEY re: Maranatha Bedford served Summons and Complaint upon MARGARET GIRGES by Process Server. MARGARET GIRGES served on 9/26/2019. (HAMERMESH, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WILLIAM T. HANGLEY re: Maranatha Bedford served Summons and Complaint upon FRANK GIRGES by Process Server. FRANK GIRGES served on 9/26/2019. (HAMERMESH, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WILLIAM T. HANGLEY re: Maranatha Bedford served Summons and Complaint upon CLARK GIRGES by Process Server. CLARK GIRGES served on 9/26/2019. (HAMERMESH, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WILLIAM T. HANGLEY re: Maranatha Bedford served Summons and Complaint upon ANDREW GIRGES by Process Server. ANDREW GIRGES served on 9/26/2019. (HAMERMESH, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WILLIAM T. HANGLEY re: Daniel R. Ward served Summons and Complaint upon THE OMNI COLLECTIVE LLC by Process Server. THE OMNI COLLECTIVE LLC served on 9/23/2019. (HAMERMESH, MATTHEW) |
Filing 5
ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PARTIES' STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. #4 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PARTIES' STIPULATION (DOC. NO. #4 ) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. DEFENDANTS SHALL ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 4, 2019.SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 10/10/2019. 10/10/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, filed by ANDREW GIRGES, CLARK GIRGES, FRANK GIRGES, MARGARET GIRGES, SAMEH GIRGES, THE OMNI COLLECTIVE LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(GREEN, CASEY) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER OUTLINED HEREIN.SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 9/4/2019. 9/4/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rt) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by LEASING COMPANY, INC.(ahf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW GIRGES, CLARK GIRGES, FRANK GIRGES, MARGARET GIRGES, SAMEH GIRGES, THE OMNI COLLECTIVE LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 202818.), filed by WILLIAM T. HANGLEY, FLEETWAY LEASING COMPANY, INC. . (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12)(ahf) |
| Summons Issued as to ANDREW GIRGES, CLARK GIRGES, FRANK GIRGES, MARGARET GIRGES, SAMEH GIRGES, THE OMNI COLLECTIVE LLC. 6 Forwarded To: Counsel on 8/29/2019 (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
