RILEY v. SAUL
Plaintiff: LUQMAN RAHEEM RILEY
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 2:2019cv03983
Filed: August 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: THOMAS J RUETER
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2019 Filing 10 Social Security Magistrate Consent by LUQMAN RAHEEM RILEY.. (TOLER, SUSAN)
October 8, 2019 Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by LUQMAN RAHEEM RILEY.. (TOLER, SUSAN) Modified on 10/8/2019 (afm, ). (FILED IN ERROR, ATTORNEY TO REFILE USING CORRECT EVENT)
October 7, 2019 Filing 8 US Marshal Return Re: Summons and Complaint Served upon the Commissioner of Social Security on 9/10/19 via FEDEX and the Atty. General on 9/9/19 via FEDEX. See attached receipt. (jaa, )
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THE FORM WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 9/27/19. (Attachments: #1 CONSENT) 9/30/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
September 6, 2019 Filing 6 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (jl, )
September 4, 2019 Filing 5 Standing Procedural Order for Cases Seeking Social Security Review 9/4/19 Entered and copies e-mailed. (jaa, )
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED; THE COMPLAINT IS DEEEMD FILED; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONSES; THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 9/4/19.9/4/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
September 4, 2019 3 Summons Issued as to ANDREW SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: 2 U.S. MARSHALS AND 1 U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL on 9/4/19 (jaa, )
August 30, 2019 Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(rf, )
August 30, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL, filed by LUQMAN RAHEEM RILEY.(rf, )
August 30, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by LUQMAN RAHEEM RILEY.(rf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RILEY v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LUQMAN RAHEEM RILEY
Represented By: SUSAN G. TOLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?