DUGLAS v. SCHULZ
Plaintiff: LOLITA DOUGLAS and LOLITA DUGLAS
Defendant: STEFFAN W. SCHULZ
Case Number: 2:2019cv04107
Filed: September 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: GENE EK PRATTER
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER THAT THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. MS.DUGLAS'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/31/19. 10/31/19 ENTERED AND MAILED TO PRO SE.(jl, )
October 31, 2019 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. MS.DUGLAS'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED AS MOOT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/31/19. 10/31/19 ENTERED AND MAILED TO PRO SE.(jl, )
October 22, 2019 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against STEFFAN W. SCHULZ, filed by LOLITA DUGLAS, JURY DEMAND.(jl, )
October 22, 2019 Filing 6 LOLITA DUGLAS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS..(jl, )
September 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. MS. DUGLAS MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 9/25/19. 9/25/19 ENTERED AND MAILED TO PRO SE WITH FORMS.(jl, )
September 25, 2019 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 9/25/19. 9/25/19 ENTERED AND MAILED TO PRO SE WITH FORMS.(jl, )
September 9, 2019 Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. MAILED TO DUGLAS. (fdc)
September 9, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against STEFFAN W. SCHULZ, filed by LOLITA DUGLAS. (IFP PENDING)(fdc)
September 9, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by LOLITA DUGLAS. (fdc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DUGLAS v. SCHULZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEFFAN W. SCHULZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LOLITA DOUGLAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LOLITA DUGLAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?