ROSSER v. GARMAN et al
QUINCEY ROSSER |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: PENNSYLVANIA and MARK GARMAN |
2:2019cv04309 |
September 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JEFFREY L SCHMEHL |
CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER OF 9/24/2019 THAT PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED; THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA, WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 9/24/2019. 9/24/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. (DT) |
Copies of Petition for Habeas Corpus, Docket Sheet and Order e-mailed to District Attorney's Office of Philadelphia. (DT) |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jaa, ) Modified on 9/19/2019 (jaa, ). |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by QUINCEY ROSSER. (jaa, ) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus together with statement in support of request to proceed in forma pauperis filed by QUINCEY ROSSER.(jaa, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by QUINCEY ROSSER.(jaa, ) Modified on 10/31/2019 (nd, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.