LABRICE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| MICHAEL LABRICE |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHRISTOPHER FLACCO and RICK ROSS |
| 2:2019cv04377 |
| September 22, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| ANITA B BRODY |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHRISTOPHER FLACCO, RICK ROSS.Certificate of Service.(ALLEN, TIFFANY) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by John D. Scanlon re: served Summons and Complaint upon Christopher Flacco, via Deidre Thurston by Person authorized to accept on 11/01/2019 (CORCORAN, J.) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service by John D. Scanlon re: served Summons and Complaint upon City of Philadelphia, Deirdre Thurston by Personal Service on 11/01/2019 (CORCORAN, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHRISTOPHER FLACCO, RICK ROSS ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 204016.), filed by MICHAEL LABRICE. (Attachments: #1 EXHIBIT, #2 COVER SHEETS)(sg, ) |
| 3 Summons Issued as to CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHRISTOPHER FLACCO, RICK ROSS. 3 Forwarded To: PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL on 9/24/2019 (sg, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by MICHAEL LABRICE. (sg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.