DIGIANVITTORIO v. SANCTUARY CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| R. CAESAR AUGUSTUS DIGIANVITTORIO |
| ATTORNEY LEE M. SHLAMOWERTZ, ASHLEY L. MUNZ, CITY OF PHILA./CITY HALL, WAYNE SHADOW, LLC PA. CO., ATTORNEY PREDRAG FILIPOVIC and SANCTUARY CITY OF PHILADELPHIA |
| 2:2019cv04532 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION REQUESTING A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT (ECF NOS. #1 , 2 ) ARE HEREBY DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 10/1/19. 10/2/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. (va, )
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (amas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF PHILA./CITY HALL, PREDRAG FILIPOVIC, ASHLEY L. MUNZ, SANCTUARY CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LEE M. SHLAMOWERTZ, WAYNE SHADOW, LLC PA. CO. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 204454.), filed by R. CAESAR AUGUSTUS DIGIANVITTORIO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Designation Form, CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK FORM)(amas) |
| 6 Summons Issued as to CITY OF PHILA./CITY HALL, PREDRAG FILIPOVIC, ASHLEY L. MUNZ, SANCTUARY CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LEE M. SHLAMOWERTZ, WAYNE SHADOW, LLC PA. CO. GIVEN TO PLAINTIFF on 10/1/2019 (amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
