BRAYBOY v. COOPER et al
Plaintiff: RODRICK M. BRAYBOY
Defendant: AGENT READINGER, SUPERVISOR BRASSWELL and DEPUTY COOPER
Case Number: 2:2019cv04608
Filed: October 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: MITCHELL S GOLDBERG
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; IF PLAINITFF SEEKS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERI HE SHALL WITHIN THIRY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS INMATE ACCOUNT FOR THE SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD FROM 4/3/19 THROUGH 10/3/19 OR HE CAN REMIT THE $400.00 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 11/20/19. 11/21/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
October 25, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by RODRICK M. BRAYBOY.(amas)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDERED THAT IF PLAINTIFF SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OPF THIS ORDER SUBMIT THE $400.00 FILING FEE TO THE CLERK OF COURT OR FILE AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR THE SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD FROM 4/3/19 THROUGH 10/3/19. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH PLAINTIFF WITH A BLANK APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BEARING THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER THIS CASE WILLL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO PETITIONER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 10/15/19. 10/15/19 ENTERED AND COPY OF ORDER AND FORMS MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(jpd)
October 3, 2019 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (amas)
October 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRASSWELL, COOPER, READINGER, filed by RODRICK M. BRAYBOY. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED) (Attachments: #1 Designation Form. CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK FORM)(amas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BRAYBOY v. COOPER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AGENT READINGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUPERVISOR BRASSWELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPUTY COOPER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RODRICK M. BRAYBOY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?