FENNELL v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
| KLAYTON FENNELL |
| COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC and COMCAST CORPORATION |
| 2:2019cv04750 |
| October 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MICHAEL M BAYLSON |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by KLAYTON FENNELL. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC waiver sent on 10/17/2019, answer due 12/16/2019. (OELTJEN, KATHERINE) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by KLAYTON FENNELL. COMCAST CORPORATION waiver sent on 10/17/2019, answer due 12/16/2019. (OELTJEN, KATHERINE) |
| 2 Summons Issued as to COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION. Forwarded To: PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 10/16/2019 (amas) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by KLAYTON FENNELL. (amas) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by STEPHEN G. CONSOLE on behalf of KLAYTON FENNELL with Certificate of Service(CONSOLE, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-13859399.), filed by KLAYTON FENNELL.(OELTJEN, KATHERINE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
