MATHIS v. BENDER et al
DERRICK MATHIS |
MRS. PATTER, WELLS FARGO CORPORATION, MRS. WILSON, MRS. BENDER and MRS. POTTER |
2:2019cv04804 |
October 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED IN EACH OF THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASES ARE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUFFICIENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO ALLOW THE COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER HE HAS THE MEANS TO PAY THE FEES TO COMMENCE THIS CASE AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PLAINTIFF AN APPROPRIATE NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IN BOTH CASES, BEARING THE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER OF EACH CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/2/19.12/3/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF WITH FORMS.(jaa, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (mbh, ) (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/18/2019) (lisad, ). |
Filing 2 Complaint against BENDER, PATTER, WELLS FARGO CORPORATION and WILSON filed by DERRICK MATHIS. No envelope included. (mbh, ) (Main Document 2 replaced on 10/18/2019) (lisad, ). Modified on 10/18/2019 (lisad, ). |
Filing 1 MOTION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS FILED BY DERRICK MATHIS.(mbh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.