LEATHERS v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE et al
BRENDA LEATHERS |
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE and GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC |
2:2019cv04939 |
October 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
J CURTIS JOYNER |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT UNTIL 12/18/19. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 11/21/19. 11/22/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, ) Modified on 11/25/2019 (lisad, ). |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service by ROBERT CAMPBELL re: served SUMMONS upon GLAXOSMITHKLINE by PERSONAL on 10-28-2019 (KEESLER, SUSAN) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Service by ROBERT CAMPBELL re: served SUMMONS upon GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC AND SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP by PERSONAL on 10-29-2019 (KEESLER, SUSAN) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GLAXOSMITHKLINE, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE205601.), filed by BRENDA LEATHERS.(bw, ) |
3 Summons Issued as to GLAXOSMITHKLINE, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 10/23/2019 (bw, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by BRENDA LEATHERS. (bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.