WILLIS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS et al
KEVIN WILLIS |
MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS, PWM CONSULTANTS, INC. and PAMELA MCKINNEY |
2:2019cv05032 |
October 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JUAN R SANCHEZ |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER THAT WILLIS'S CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 12/5/19. 12/6/19 ENTERED AND COPY MAILED TO WILLIS. (fdc) |
Filing 4 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE #1 MOTION FOR IFP FOR LACK OF INFORMATION, WITH 30 DAYS LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED IFP FORM, ETC. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 10/31/19. 11/1/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE WITH IFP FORM. (va, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jl, ) (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/29/2019) (md, ). |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against PAMELA MCKINNEY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS, PWM CONSULTANTS, INC., filed by KEVIN WILLIS. (IFP PENDING), JURY DEMAND (Attachments: #1 CASE FORMS)(jl, ) (No Envelope Provided) Modified on 10/29/2019 (md). (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/29/2019) (md, ). |
Filing 1 KEVIN WILLIS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS..(jl, )(No Envelope Provided) Modified on 10/29/2019 (md). |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by KEVIN WILLIS. (md) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.