MCCLAIN v. SHAYLOR et al
| RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR. |
| CYNTHIA LINK, LT. A. DOE, Z. MELENDEZ, C.O., C.O. B. DOE, LT. WASHINGTON and WENDY SHAYLOR |
| 2:2019cv05148 |
| November 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDERED THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND PLAINITFF SHALL FILE A RESPONSE BY 1/27/2020. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 12/11/19. 12/12/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(jpd, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR(jpd, ) |
| Filing 4 PLAINTIFF RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME..(jpd, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Z. MELENDEZ, C.O., WASHINGTON.Memorandum, Certificate of Service.(MOZDZIOCK, JEFFREY) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. MAILED TO MCCLAIN. (fdc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Z. MELENDEZ, C.O., WASHINGTON from Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, case number 19-23012, Certificate of Service. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 206183)(fdc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
