ERAZO v. SAUL
Plaintiff: JOSELYN ERAZO
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 2:2019cv05149
Filed: November 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: GERALD J PAPPERT
Referring Judge: THOMAS J RUETER
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER TO HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT FOR ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 12/4/2019. 12/4/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
November 27, 2019 Filing 9 Social Security Declining Magistrate Consent by JOSELYN ERAZO.. (CRAYNOCK, JOHN)
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THE CONSENT TO OR DECLINATION OF JURISDICTION OF A MAGISTRATE JUDGE WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 11/26/2019. 11/27/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
November 15, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US MARSHAL as to Nancy Berryhill and Atty. General by FEDEX on 11/12/19. (sg, ) Modified on 11/19/2019 (lisad, ).
November 8, 2019 Filing 6 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (sg, )
November 6, 2019 Filing 5 Procedural Order 11/7/2019 Entered and copies e-mailed. (sg, )
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDERED THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL ISSUE SUMMONSES. THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE E.D.P.A. SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND COMPLAINT AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE E.D.P.A.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 11/6/2019.11/7/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
November 6, 2019 3 Summons Issued as to ANDREW M. SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: 1 TO US ATTORNEY, 2 TO US MARSHAL on 11/7/2019 (sg, )
November 1, 2019 Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(rf, )
November 1, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by JOSELYN ERAZO. *IFP PENDING*(rf, )
November 1, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by JOSELYN ERAZO.(rf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ERAZO v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSELYN ERAZO
Represented By: JOHN W. CRAYNOCK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?