Kutty v. Sap America, Inc. et al
| Mumtaz Kutty |
| John Insley and SAP AMERICA, INC. |
| 2:2019cv05251 |
| November 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD J PAPPERT |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 34 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by Emily Stehr McGrath on behalf of Mumtaz Kutty(rf, ) |
| Filing 33 NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by Mumtaz Kutty. Appearance of KEVIN LOVITZ, and Withdrawal of Barbara Lawless. (LOVITZ, KEVIN) Modified on 12/2/2019 (md). |
| Filing 32 NOTICE of Appearance by KEVIN I. LOVITZ on behalf of Mumtaz Kutty (LOVITZ, KEVIN) |
| Filing 31 Case transferred in from District of California Northern; Case Number 5:19-cv-02473. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 30
ORDER GRANTING SAP'S MOTION TO TRANSFER Re: Dkt. No. #10 . Case is transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 11/5/19. The Clerk to transfer the entire case to Eastern District of Pennsylvania and CLOSE the file. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.]
|
| Filing 29 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen: Motion Hearing held on 9/17/2019 [re: #9 #10 ]. Matter taken under submission.FTR Time: 10:17-10:57am. Plaintiff's Attorney: Emily McGrath. Defendants' Attorney: Emilie Petirs & Cynthia Jara. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 9/17/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 28 PDF with attached Audio File. Court Date & Time [ 9/17/2019 10:17:52 AM ]. File Size [ 19208 KB ]. Run Time [ 00:40:01 ]. (courtspeak). [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 27 OBJECTIONS to re #24 Reply to Opposition/Response, #25 Reply to Opposition/Response, #26 Reply to Opposition/Response, Plaintiff's Objections to Defendant's Reply Evidence by Mumtaz Kutty. (Lawless, Barbara) (Filed on 9/6/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 26 REPLY (re #10 MOTION to Change Venue /Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) ) filed bySap America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Supplemental Declaration of Jason Russell in support of Defendant SAP's Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a))(Johnsrud, Brian) (Filed on 8/30/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 25 REPLY (re #9 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byJohn Insley. (Johnsrud, Brian) (Filed on 8/30/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 24 REPLY (re #8 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed bySap America, Inc.. (Johnsrud, Brian) (Filed on 8/30/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 23 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #10 MOTION to Change Venue /Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) ) Plaintiff's Opposition to SAP's Motion to Transfer Venue filed byMumtaz Kutty. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mumtaz Kutty ISO Plaintiff's Opposition to SAP's Motion to Transfer Venue, #2 Proposed Order [Proposed Order] Denying SAP's Motion to Transfer Venue)(Lawless, Barbara) (Filed on 8/16/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 22 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #9 MOTION to Dismiss ) Plaintiff's Opposition to Insley's Motion to Dismiss filed byMumtaz Kutty. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mumtaz Kutty ISO Plaintiff's Opposition to Insley's Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order [Proposed Order] Denying Insley's Motion to Dismiss)(Lawless, Barbara) (Filed on 8/16/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 21 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #8 MOTION to Dismiss ) Plaintiff's Opposition to SAP's Motion to Dismiss filed byMumtaz Kutty. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Mumtaz Kutty ISO Plaintiff's Opposition to SAP's Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order [Proposed Order] Denying SAP's Motion to Dismiss)(Lawless, Barbara) (Filed on 8/16/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE resetting Motion Hearing. #8 MOTION to Dismiss , #9 MOTION to Dismiss , #10 MOTION to Change Venue /Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) has been reset to 9/17/2019 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) [ (dmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #18 STIPULATION to Reschedule Hearing Date and Briefing Schedule for #8 MOTION to Dismiss, #9 MOTION to Dismiss, #10 MOTION to Change Venue /Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Responses due by 8/16/2019. Replies due by 8/30/2019. Motion Hearing reset to 9/24/2019 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 7/25/2019. (dmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.]
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #8 MOTION to Dismiss , #9 MOTION to Dismiss , #10 MOTION to Change Venue /Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) to Reschedule Hearing Date and Briefing Schedule filed by Mumtaz Kutty. (Lawless, Barbara) (Filed on 7/24/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE Vacating Initial Case Management Conference: In light of the pending motions to dismiss, the Court VACATES the August 6, 2019 Initial Case Management conference. The Court will reschedule the Parties' Initial Case Management Conference after the Court rules on the pending motions. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 16 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Johnsrud, Brian) (Filed on 7/17/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 15 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Johnsrud, Brian) (Filed on 7/17/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 14 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options for Plaintiff Mumtaz Kutty (Lawless, Barbara) (Filed on 7/16/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Stehr McGrath (McGrath, Emily) (Filed on 7/15/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John Insley, Sap America, Inc... (Johnsrud, Brian) (Filed on 7/15/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff/Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/22/2019. (dmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Change Venue /Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) filed by Sap America, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 8/27/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Responses due by 7/26/2019. Replies due by 8/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of John Insley iso Def. SAP's Motion to Transfer Venue, #2 Declaration of Susan Vickers iso Def. SAP's Motion to Transfer Venue, #3 Declaration of Jason Russell iso Def. SAP's Motion to Transfer Venue, #4 Declaration of Elizabeth Heck iso Def. SAP's Motion to Transfer Venue, #5 Def. SAP's Request for Judicial Notice iso Motion to Transfer Venue, #6 Proposed Order Granting Def. SAP's Motion to Transfer Venue)(Johnsrud, Brian) (Filed on 7/12/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by John Insley. Motion Hearing set for 8/27/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Responses due by 7/26/2019. Replies due by 8/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Def. Insley's Request for Judicial Notice iso Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order Granting Def. Insley's Motion to Dismiss)(Johnsrud, Brian) (Filed on 7/12/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sap America, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 8/27/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor before Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Responses due by 7/26/2019. Replies due by 8/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 SAP's Request for Judicial Notice iso It's Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order Granting SAP's Motion to Dismiss)(Johnsrud, Brian) (Filed on 7/12/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Mumtaz Kutty.. (Lawless, Barbara) (Filed on 5/21/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Mumtaz Kutty. Service waived by All Defendants. SAP America, Inc. and John Insley (Lawless, Barbara) (Filed on 5/16/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to John Insley, Sap America, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 7/ 30/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/6/2019 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/21/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Lawless, Barbara) (Filed on 5/7/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Mumtaz Kutty v. SAP America, Inc. et al against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13326198.). Filed byMumtaz Kutty. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lawless, Barbara) (Filed on 5/7/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 11/7/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
