D'AMBRA v. SAUL
KELSON GREGORY D'AMBRA |
ANDREW M. SAUL |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
2:2019cv05327 |
November 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
HENRY S PERKIN |
CYNTHIA M RUFE |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service by U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE re: served SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT upon ATTORNEY GENERAL; NANCY BERRYHILL by CERTIFIED MAIL (jl, ) |
Filing 9 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (jl, ) |
|
Filing 7 Social Security Declining Magistrate Consent by KELSON GREGORY D'AMBRA.. (SILVER, JOSEPH) |
Filing 6 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (DT) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/14/2019: #1 Consent or Declination of Jurisdiction by Magistrate Judge) (dt, ). |
Filing 5 Procedural Order 11/14/2019 Entered and copies mailed and e-mailed. (DT) |
|
3 Summons Issued as to ANDREW M. SAUL. 2 Summonses Forwarded To: U.S. Marshal on 11/14/19. 1 Summons forwarded to U.S. Attorney on 11/14/19. (DT) |
Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT)(bw, ) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by KELSON GREGORY D'AMBRA.(bw, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by KELSON GREGORY D'AMBRA..(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.