ROGERS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
SYDNEY ROGERS |
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON AND JOHNSON |
2:2019cv05461 |
November 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MARK A KEARNEY |
P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (ECF DOC. NO. #4 ) IS DENIED; FOLLOWING OUR NOVEMBER 21, 2019 ORDER (ECF DOC. NO. #5 ), THE CLERK OF COURTSHALL TRANSFER THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA AND CLOSE THIS CASE IN OUR DISTRICT; AND, DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF DOC. NO. 12) IS DENIED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PRESENT ARGUMENTS IN THE TRANSFEREE COURT IF WARRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 12/23/2019. 12/23/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nd, ) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 12/23/2019. 12/23/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nd, ) |
Filing 21 Minute Entry for proceedings held before HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY Motion Hearing held on 12/17/19 re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by SYDNEY ROGERS Court Reporter: S. GAGLIARDI. (rf, ) |
Filing 20 RESPONSE in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit D, #2 Exhibit E, #3 Exhibit F, #4 Exhibit G)(CALLSEN, JULIE) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by SYDNEY ROGERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Filing, #2 Exhibit B-State Court Filing, #3 Exhibit C-State Court Order, #4 Exhibit D-Unpublished State Court Opinion, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(QUIRK, MICHAEL) |
Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by SYDNEY ROGERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Order)(QUIRK, MICHAEL) |
Filing 17 ORDER THAT MOTION HEARING SET FOR 12/17/2019 10:00 AM AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 12/6/19. 12/9/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 16 Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order, #2 Exhibit Order, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Secant Group, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to the Biomaterials Access Assurance Act, #4 Exhibit Order)(CALLSEN, JULIE) |
Filing 15 Response to Plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority re #9 Order,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings, by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON. (CALLSEN, JULIE) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by SYDNEY ROGERS. (QUIRK, MICHAEL) |
Filing 13 Response in Support re #5 Order,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (CALLSEN, JULIE) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON.Memorandum. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)(CALLSEN, JULIE) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by DANIEL R. LAPINSKI on behalf of SYDNEY ROGERS with Certificate of Service(LAPINSKI, DANIEL) |
Filing 10 NOTICE RE: SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF THE MOTION FOR REMAND (rf, ) |
Filing 9 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE (DOC. 8) IS GRANTED AND WE ACCEPT THE CITED AUTHORITY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF THE MOTION FOR REMAND (DOC. 4) AND NOTHING IN THIS ORDER ALTERS THE DEFENDANTS RESPONSE DATE TO THE MOTION FOR REMAND (DOC. 4). SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 11/25/19. 11/25/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Authority in Support of Motion for Remand filed by SYDNEY ROGERS.Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Supplemental Authority)(QUIRK, MICHAEL) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by MOLLY ELIZABETH FLYNN on behalf of ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON with Certificate of Service(FLYNN, MOLLY) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by MELISSA A. MERK on behalf of ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON with Certificate of Service(MERK, MELISSA) |
Filing 5 ORDER THAT EACH PARTY SHALL SHOW CAUSE IN A MEMORANDUM NOT EXCEEDING TEN PAGES FILED ON OR BEFORE 11/29/19 AS TO WHY WE SHOULD NOT TRANSFER THIS MATTER TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OR THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1404. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 11/21/19. 11/22/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by SYDNEY ROGERS.Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(QUIRK, MICHAEL) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL J. QUIRK on behalf of SYDNEY ROGERS with Certificate of Service(QUIRK, MICHAEL) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 Identifying Corporate Parent JOHNSON AND JOHNSON for ETHICON, INC.., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON.(rf, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON from COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, case number 190901098. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE207166), EXHIBITS, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(rf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.