MITCHELL v. GLIMORE et al
EDDIE MITCHELL |
ROBERT GLIMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2019cv05507 |
November 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GENE EK PRATTER |
DAVID R STRAWBRIDGE |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDERED THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE AN ANSWER AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW WITH SUPPORTING EXHIBITS ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 24, 2020 AND THE OFFICE OF THE PROTHONOTARY OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 24, 2020 COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST-CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. EDDIE MITCHELL, NO. CP-51-CR-0005026-2013. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 1/7/20. 1/8/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND CERTIFIED MAIL WITH COPY OF ORDER, PETITION AND DOCKET TO THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY GENERALS OF PHILADELPHIA AND HARRISBURG, FAXED TO THE CLERK OF COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA AND E-MAILED TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA AND ATTORNEY GENERALS.(jpd, ) |
COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND CERTIFIED MAIL WITH COPY OF ORDER, PETITION AND DOCKET TO THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY GENERALS OF PHILADELPHIA AND HARRISBURG, FAXED TO THE CLERK OF COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA AND E-MAILED TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA AND ATTORNEY GENERALS.(jpd, ) |
Filing 5 ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 1/6/20. 1/7/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED WITH COPY OF PETITION, ORDER AND DOCKET SHEET TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY.(jpd,) |
COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED WITH COPY OF PETITION, ORDER AND DOCKET SHEET TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY.(jpd,) (jpd, ) |
Filing 4 PETITIONER'S SIGNED PETITION RETURNED AS PER ORDER OF THE COURT. (jpd, ) (Main Document 4 replaced on 1/7/2020) (jpd, ). |
Filing 3 ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL RETURN TO PETITIONER HIS PETITION AND SHALL RETAIN A COPY IN THE CIVIL ACTION FILE. IF PLAINTIFF SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, HE SHALL SIGN THE PETITION AND RETURN IT TO THE COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THAT DATE OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/6/19. 12/6/19 ENTERED AND COPY OF ORDER AND PETITION MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER(jpd, ) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (amas) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus together with statement in support of request to proceed in forma pauperis ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 207235.), filed by EDDIE MITCHELL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, DESIGNATION FORM, CASE MANAGEMENT TRACK FORM)(amas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.