FLORES SECUNDINO v. KELLAR
Plaintiff: EDUARDO FLORES SECUNDINO and MIGUEL SECUNDINO-MARCIAL
Defendant: OFFICER JAMES KELLAR
Case Number: 2:2019cv05508
Filed: November 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOHN M YOUNGE
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED. IF PLAINTIFF SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $400 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR THE SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD FROM 5/21/19 THROUGH 11/21/19. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH SECUNDINO WITH A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURTS CURRENT STANDARD PRISONER IN FORMA PAUPERIS FORM BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. PLAINTIFF MAY USE THIS FORM TO SEEK LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IF HE CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE FEES TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. IF SECUNDINO FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 1/8/20. 1/9/20 ENTERED AND COPY OF ORDER AND APPLICATION MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF.(jpd, )
January 7, 2020 Filing 4 PLAINTIFF EDUARDO FLORES SECUNDINO'S REQUEST FOR THIRTY (30) DAY EXTENSION(jpd, )
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDERED THAT IF PLAINTIFF SEEKS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IN THIS ACTION HE MUST WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER EITHER REMIT THE $400.00 FILING FEE TO THE COURT OR FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF HIS INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR THE SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD FROM 5/21/19 THROUGH 11/21/19.THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE PLAINTIFF WITH A BLANK APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BEARING THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. PLAINTIFF MAY USE THIS FORM TO SEEK LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER HIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. YOUNGE ON 12/3/19. 12/4/19 ENTERED AND COPY OF ORDER AND APPLICATION MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(jpd )
November 21, 2019 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (sg, )
November 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JAMES KELLAR, filed by EDUARDO FLORES SECUNDINO.NO FEE PAID, NO IFP.(sg, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FLORES SECUNDINO v. KELLAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EDUARDO FLORES SECUNDINO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MIGUEL SECUNDINO-MARCIAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICER JAMES KELLAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?