BROOKER V. OBERLANDER, et al.
MIKECHEL BROOKER |
MICHAEL OBERLANDER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA |
2:2019cv05569 |
November 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
MARILYN HEFFLEY |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDERED THAT RESPONDENTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY 4/9/2020 IS GRANTED. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 1/14/20. 1/14/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MICHAEL OBERLANDER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA.Certificate of Service.Motions referred to MARILYN HEFFLEY.(WEAR, KELLY) |
Filing 5 ORDERED THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS TO THE PETITION WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. THE CLERK OF COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH v. OBERLANDER, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA, CP-51-CR-0006874-2009 WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PRISONER STATE RECORD DUE BY 2/11/2020. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 12/11/19. 12/12/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND, CERTIFIED MAIL WITH COPY OF ORDER, PETITION AND DOCKET TO THE DISTRICT ATTY. OF PHILA., ATTY. GENS OF PHILA., AND HARRISBURG, FAXED TO THE CLERK OF COURT OF CCP OF PHILA., AND E-MAILED TO DISTRICT ATTY OF PHILA., AND ATTY GENERALS. (jpd ) Modified on 12/12/2019 (jpd, ). |
COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND, CERTIFIED MAIL WITH COPY OF ORDER, PETITION AND DOCKET TO THE DISTRICT ATTY OF PHILA., ATTY GENS OF PHILA., AND HARRISBURG, FAXED TO THE CLERK OF COURT OF CCP OF PHILA., AND E-MAILED TO DISTRICT ATTY OF PHILA., AND ATTY GENERALS. (jpd ) (jpd, ) |
Filing 4 ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE MARILYN HEFFLEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/10/19. Motions referred to MARILYN HEFFLEY. 12/11/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED WITH COPY OF PETITION ORDER AND DOCKET TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILA.,(jpd, ) |
MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED WITH COPY OF PETITION ORDER AND DOCKET TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILA.,(jpd, ) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 2 PRE-DISPOSITION MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, EXPANSION OF THE RECORD AND RULE6, PRE-DISPOSITION DISCOVERY filed by MIKECHEL BROOKER..(bw, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number PPE207447.), filed by MIKECHEL BROOKER.(bw, ) Modified on 11/27/2019 (bw, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.