OGELSBY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
| LAMAR OGELSBY |
| TAMMY FERGUSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA |
| 2:2019cv05598 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN R PADOVA |
| LYNNE A SITARSKI |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Modify Briefing Schedule filed by LAMAR OGELSBY..Motions referred to LYNNE A. SITARSKI.(SCHWARTZ, KARL) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by CARI L. MAHLER on behalf of THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA with Certificate of Service(MAHLER, CARI) |
| COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, CERTIFIED MAIL WITH COPY OF PETITIONS ORDER AND DOCKET TO THE PHILA., DA, ATTY GENS OF PA AND HARRISBURG, FAXED TO THE CLERK OF COURT OF C.C.P. OF PHILA., AND E-MAILED TO THE DA OF PHILA., AND ATTY GENS.(jpd, ) (jpd, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE A SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS BY 2/6/20 PURSUANT TO RULE 5, 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2254, ETC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED TO ENSURE THAT IN A FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF A STATE CONVICTION, ANY CRIME VICTIMS ARE AFFORDED THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE CRIME VICTIMS ACT, AS AMENDED DECEMBER 1, 2009, ETC. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 12/23/19. 12/24/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ke)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE LYNNE A. SITARSKI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 12/18/19. Motions referred to LYNNE A. SITARSKI. 12/19/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED WITH COPY OF PETITION ORDER AND DOCKET TO THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY.(jpd, )
|
| COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED WITH COPY OF PETITION ORDER AND DOCKET TO THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY.(jpd, ) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED DOCUMENT by LAMAR OGELSBY. Amendment to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with Corrected Sec. 2254 Form. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit PA Superior Ct Opinion, #2 Exhibit Common Pleas Ct Opinion, #3 Certificate of Service)(SCHWARTZ, KARL) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL FURNISH OGELSBY WITH BLANK COPIES OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD FORM FILING A PETITION. IF OGELSBY INTENDS TO PURSUE THIS MATTER HE SHALL COMPLETE THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD FORM, SIGN THE COMPLETED PETITION, AND RETURN IT TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 12/10/2019. 12/10/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. MAILED COPY OF BLANK PETITION TO COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF.(amas)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by KARL DAVID SCHWARTZ on behalf of LAMAR OGELSBY (bw, ) Modified on 11/29/2019 (lvj, ). |
| Filing 3 MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE A BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER'S HABEAS CORPUS PETITION. filed by LAMAR OGELSBY..(bw, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by JONATHAN D. CIOSCHI on behalf of LAMAR OGELSBY (bw, ) Modified on 11/29/2019 (lvj, ). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number PPE207495.), filed by LAMAR OGELSBY. (Attachments: #1 PETITION A)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
