CICCONE et al v. IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
| PAVEL KELLY, DAVID MORDELL and CATHERINE CICCONE |
| IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and DENNIS MARTIN SPELLMAN |
| 2:2019cv05715 |
| December 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint together with Affirmative Defenses by IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.(WEBB, ANDRE) Modified on 1/13/2020 (tjd). |
| Filing 5 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of Phila. County. (kw, ) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Cert/Reg mail re: served Complaint upon IDS Property Casualty Ins. by Cert/Reg mail on 11/18/2019 (SCHNEIDER, ANDREW) |
| Filing 3 12(b) PROCEDURAL ORDER (sl, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by ANDRE J. WEBB on behalf of IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (WEBB, ANDRE) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY from COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, case number 191101493. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Filing fee $ 411 receipt number PPE207753)(bw, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/9/2019) (bw, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
