THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
Plaintiff: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., GURU KOP, INC. and MARKET 24, LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv05918
Filed: December 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: PETRESE B TUCKER
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2020 Filing 4 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of MONTGOMERY County. (Attachments: #1 ATTACHMENT, #2 ATTACHMENT, #3 ATTACHMENT, #4 ATTACHMENT, #5 ATTACHMENT, #6 ATTACHMENT, #7 ATTACHMENT, #8 ATTACHMENT, #9 ATTACHMENT, #10 ATTACHMENT, #11 ATTACHMENT, #12 ATTACHMENT, #13 ATTACHMENT, #14 ATTACHMENT, #15 ATTACHMENT)(amas)
January 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER THAT THE PROTHONOTARY OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, MAY SUBMIT THE AFORESAID RECORDS TO THE CLERK OF THIS COURT IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT, SO THAT THEY CAN BE FILED IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 1/27/2020. 1/29/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
January 9, 2020 Original record transferred to the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA via interdistrict transfer system. (lvj, )
January 2, 2020 Filing 2 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-18) THAT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION, THE ACTION(S) ON THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE ARE TRANSFERRED UNDER 28 U.S.C. SEC. 1407 TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ORDER OF 10/2/2019, AND, WITH THE CONSENT OF THAT COURT, ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK, III.(amas)
December 16, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL IWTH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JUUL LABS, INC. from COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, case number 2019-25931. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PPE208354) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jaa, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC.
Represented By: JOHN P. ELLIOTT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GURU KOP, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARKET 24, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Represented By: DANIEL E. GUSTAFSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?