CANADY v. SAUL
| WILLIAM BOYD CANADY |
| ANDREW M. SAUL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 2:2019cv05972 |
| December 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JACOB P HART |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| 3 Summonses & Copies of Complaint Issued as to ANDREW M. SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Forwarded To: US Marshal (2) and US Attorney (1) on 2/14/20. (va, ) |
| Filing 6 Procedural Order 2/12/20 Entered and copies e-mailed. (va, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK SHALL ISSUE SUMMONS AND SERVE US ATTY. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JACOB P. HART ON 2/12/20. 2/13/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
| Filing 4 Social Security Magistrate Consent by WILLIAM BOYD CANADY.. (CHERMOL, DAVID) |
| Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(kw, ) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL (IFP PENDING), filed by WILLIAM BOYD CANADY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(kw, ) |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, FILED BY PLFF WILLIAM BOYD CANADY.(kw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
