EDELHEIT v. SAUL
Plaintiff: CLARISSA EDELHEIT
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 2:2019cv06000
Filed: December 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: THOMAS J RUETER
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2020 Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service by USMS Deputy Clerk re: served Summons & Complaint upon Nancy Berryhill, Atty. General by Fed Ex on 1/3/20 (fdc, )
January 16, 2020 Filing 9 Social Security Magistrate Consent by CLARISSA EDELHEIT.. (FEDEN, NICHOLAS)
January 15, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by CLARISSA EDELHEIT.. (FEDEN, NICHOLAS) Modified on 1/15/2020 (afm, ). (FILED IN ERROR, ATTORNEY TO REFILE USING CORRECT EVENT)
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THE NOTICE OF CONSENT TO OR DECLINATION OF JURISDICTION OF A MAGISTRATE JUDGE FORM WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 1/14/20. (Attachments: #1 Consent/Declination Form) 1/14/20 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
December 27, 2019 Filing 6 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (nd, )
December 20, 2019 Filing 5 Procedural Order 12/20/19 Entered and copies mailed and e-mailed. (fdc)
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S #1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE U.S. MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FRCP 4(I).. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER ON 12/20/19.12/20/19 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPIES FORWARDED TO U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE & U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.(fdc)
December 20, 2019 Three (3) Summons Issued as to ANDREW SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Forwarded To: U.S. Marshal Service, U.S. Attorney's Office on 12/20/19. (fdc)
December 19, 2019 Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 Consent to Assignment SS Case)(fdc, )
December 19, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL, filed by CLARISSA EDELHEIT. (IFP GRANTED) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet/Designation Form/Track Form) (fdc)
December 19, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by CLARISSA EDELHEIT..(fdc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EDELHEIT v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CLARISSA EDELHEIT
Represented By: NICHOLAS D. FEDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?