U.S. CLAIM SERVICES, INC. v. DESIMONE
| U.S. CLAIM SERVICES, INC. |
| DOMINICK DESIMONE |
| 2:2019cv06149 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| GERALD J PAPPERT |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REPLY Brief in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint filed by DOMINICK DESIMONE. (AUSTIN, ANDREW) Modified on 2/3/2020 (lisad, ). |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM of Law in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint filed by U.S. CLAIM SERVICES, INC.. (PALMER, WILLIAM) Modified on 1/27/2020 (lisad, ). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by KAREN GRETHLEIN on behalf of U.S. CLAIM SERVICES, INC. with Certificate of Service(GRETHLEIN, KAREN) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint filed by DOMINICK DESIMONE.BRIEF, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(AUSTIN, ANDREW) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by ANDREW B. AUSTIN on behalf of DOMINICK DESIMONE (AUSTIN, ANDREW) |
Filing 5
ORDERED THAT THE APPLICATION OF WILLIAM W. PALMER TO PRACTICE IN THIS COURT PRO HAC VICE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 1/6/2020.1/7/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO ATTORNEY AND UNREP AND E-MAILED. ECF APP MAILED.(sg, )
|
| Filing 4 Amended MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for William W. Palmer filed by U.S. CLAIM SERVICES, INC..Certificate of Service.(QUINN, JOHN) (FILING FEE PAID) Modified 1/8/20 (fdc). FILING FEE PAID, RECEIPT No.: 210286. Modified on 1/27/2020 (sg, ). |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE (DOC. #2 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 1/3/2020.1/3/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice filed by U.S. CLAIM SERVICES, INC..CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(QUINN, JOHN) |
| Filing 1 DECLARATORY JUDGMENT COMPLAINT against DOMINICK DESIMONE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 208915.), filed by U.S. CLAIM SERVICES, INC..(kp, ) |
| 1 Summons Issued as to DOMINICK DESIMONE. Forwarded To: COUNSEL on 12/30/2019 (kp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U.S. CLAIM SERVICES, INC. v. DESIMONE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: U.S. CLAIM SERVICES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | JOHN P. QUINN |
| Represented By: | JOHN PATRICK QUINN |
| Represented By: | KAREN GRETHLEIN |
| Represented By: | WILLIAM W. PALMER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DOMINICK DESIMONE | |
| Represented By: | ANDREW B. AUSTIN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
